"I have no explanation for why the NYT feels a need to stick Trump's name into headlines when it’s not warranted."
This is exactly right. Covering Trump when it's warranted is legitimate. Treating whatever comes out of his mouth as newsworthy and factual is not. Thank you, Mark Jacobs, for continuing to shine a light on the media's unnecessary and, frankly, problematic elevation of Trump.
"I have no explanation for why the NYT feels a need to stick Trump's name into headlines when it’s not warranted."
This is exactly right. Covering Trump when it's warranted is legitimate. Treating whatever comes out of his mouth as newsworthy and factual is not. Thank you, Mark Jacobs, for continuing to shine a light on the media's unnecessary and, frankly, problematic elevation of Trump.
"I have no explanation for why the NYT feels a need to stick Trump's name into headlines when it’s not warranted."
This is exactly right. Covering Trump when it's warranted is legitimate. Treating whatever comes out of his mouth as newsworthy and factual is not. Thank you, Mark Jacobs, for continuing to shine a light on the media's unnecessary and, frankly, problematic elevation of Trump.