8 Comments
User's avatar
Lydia Sugarman's avatar

I think you're giving Haberman and Swan way too much leeway. Aren't these the same people, or Haberman anyway, who withheld valuable information during Drumpf's first term to later include it in a book? I wouldn't trust Maggie Haberman, especially if my life depended on it.

Marycat2021's avatar

I have no use for Haberman or Swan. They are both too self serving for my taste.

Ernestine's avatar

Anonymity is protection from the president and his goons.

Susanna J. Sturgis's avatar

If they need protection from the guy they're working for, maybe they should think twice about working there?

Kay Romeo's avatar

It may not be just personally profitable access to the WH. People are likely legitimately afraid of the repercussions by Trump, his lackies in the admin and his armed militia on the ground.

And with regard to the couch fucker’s favorable treatment, maybe it is intentional because everyone knows it will drive Trump crazy for his loser VP to get good press.

Roustabout Writer's avatar

Everyone should leave JD Vance alone. He is going to faceplant upon ascension to the crown - all by himself. It is going to be humiliating how he will be treated as POTUS. Humiliating for him and this great country.

Lydia Sugarman's avatar

We don't fucking want that self-aggrandizing moron as Peter Thiel's puppet POTUS!

Michael Gurbada's avatar

Vance is being polished, because he’ll be president within eight months.